I started out playing 50NL. I bought in for my usual $25 but this time things didn’t go so well. It wasn’t that I was getting bad beat or anything, it was simply a matter of catching too many middle pairs and betting aggressively with them only to have them lose to better hands. I wasn’t playing well, my bluffs weren’t working and I wasn’t reading my opponents great either. So after I lost my original buy-in I dropped down to 25NL. I just wasn’t feeling it so I thought moving down a level was the right move.
I wasn’t playing that great at 25NL either but then I caught lightning in a bottle:
Full Tilt Poker, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold’em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com – Hand History Converter
CO: $32
BTN: $3
Hero (SB): $23.90
BB: $18.85
UTG: $27.95
MP: $28.90
Pre-Flop: 4
6
dealt to Hero (SB)
UTG calls $0.25, 3 folds, Hero calls $0.15, BB checks
Flop: ($0.75) 2
3
9
(3 Players)
Hero bets $0.75, BB folds, UTG raises to $3, Hero calls $2.25
Turn: ($6.75) 8
(2 Players)
Hero bets $6.75, UTG calls $6.75
River: ($20.25) 7
(2 Players)
Hero bets $13.90 and is All-In, UTG calls $13.90
Results: $48.05 Pot ($2.40 Rake)
Hero showed 4
6
(a flush, Nine high) and WON $45.65 (+$21.75 NET)
UTG mucked A
9
(two pair, Nines and Eights) and LOST (-$23.90 NET)
Two hands later….
Full Tilt Poker, $0.10/$0.25 NL Hold’em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com – Hand History Converter
BB: $32
UTG: $3.35
Hero (MP): $45.65
CO: $18.85
BTN: $3.70
SB: $28.65
Pre-Flop: 7
7
dealt to Hero (MP)
UTG folds, Hero calls $0.25, CO raises to $1.10, 3 folds, Hero calls $0.85
Flop: ($2.55) J
A
7
(2 Players)
Hero checks, CO bets $1.50, Hero raises to $7.05, CO raises to $17.75 and is All-In, Hero calls $10.70
Turn: ($38.05) 2
(2 Players – 1 is All-In)
River: ($38.05) 5
(2 Players – 1 is All-In)
Results: $38.05 Pot ($1.90 Rake)
Hero showed 7
7
(three of a kind, Sevens) and WON $36.15 (+$17.30 NET)
CO showed J
A
(two pair, Aces and Jacks) and LOST (-$18.85 NET)
I started off fast. I was aggressive throughout the session. Overly aggressive probably. Usually I play pretty aggressive but within reason. I wasn’t really thinking things through and I was getting caught bluffing….a lot. I was also playing way too many hands. But I think the reason I got paid off on the hands I posted is because I was so aggressive (especially post flop and beyond) and I think that helped my cause. I’ve been really trying to be aggressive especially post flop as I feel this is where most of the money is won in cash games. The pots are larger on later streets so I’ve been working on being aggressive after the flop as opposed to pre-flop.
The first hand I get a one gap suited connector in the SB. My kind of hand especially if I can see a flop cheaply and I get my wish. I get my flush draw and I raise again. This time I get a re-raise and I just flat call. Even if he/she has a set I’m in decent shape. I hit my flush and I bet yet again. I make it a big bet like I’m buying the pot. Most players at this level are going to check hoping to check raise which is the standard line. Too standard in my opinion. So I put out a pot sized bet. I’m hoping to disguise my big hand by betting big. Sounds counter intuitive doesn’t it?
It works as the villain takes his/her time before finally calling and pays me off on the river. Looking back I think I may have lost a lot of value by going all in on the river but since I was playing aggressive throughout the hand I might as well overbet the river also.
I was really surprised that he called me down with TPTK but I’m not complaining. I would like to think that I confused him with my overbets.
The hand after that was also a pretty good one. I get 77 in EP. I elect to call and see if I can set mine for cheap. I get a raise and I call. My luck is turning around because I get exactly what I hoped for….a set. I check hoping that the bandit bets out. He bets out and I check raise big. Again the standard line that most players take is check calling with this kind of board so I elect to check raise big like I’m bluffing. Again this is counter intuitive as most players at these levels are used to the check call play trying to milk that pot for as much value as they can squeeze out of it. It’s too standard IMO, so standard that I feel that I’m giving away my hand if I play this way. So I take a different line.
Sure I lose value at times when I do this but the times that I do get that guy on the hook, I’m usually taking down a huge pot. This time it works out.
I’m running good but alas the good times don’t last and eventually the well dries up and it’s back to the same old same old at Fulltilt.
I give a lot of it back but manage to leave with a profit of $15 which isn’t so bad considering. Basically these were the only huge pots that I won all session. However, this was enough to give me the cushion that I needed because I was playing skittish (ok I was a bit of a maniac and a donkey) the whole night and donked off a lot of my profit I had made from the above hands.
Oh well….that’s poker. Good thing I left otherwise I’m sure I’d probably lose it all.

June 17, 2008 at 9:30 pm |
Always a good idea to drop down if your feeling a little off, I don’t have that option yet though lol.
I’ve been doing the same thing, really working to increase my post flop aggression and for a time it worked, and then it all fell aprt for me. Recently though, I’m doing much better and I think its down to the fact that i’m not limping pre-flop as much.
My standard play with a set used to be to check-raise and get the money in like this, interestingly I’ve recently done the opposite and started to check-call, so as not to scare my opponents off. It all comes down to what works at your limit I suppose, if they expect you to check-call with a set, check-raising is a great play in my book.
best of luck xxx
June 18, 2008 at 7:07 am |
Don’t get me wrong Lucky, check calling is definitely a good strategy.
I shouldn’t have said it was a standard line but a lot of people that I’ve been playing with like to check-call with a monster instead of check raising (especially if they have a set on a non drawing board). They’ll also check call if they think the other person is holding a big pair to their set for example. I don’t know, I just felt that taking this line of check raising instead of check calling would mask my hand more. Again it depends on the situation I guess and for these hands I felt that since my image was more aggressive, I should continue to bet aggressively. Of course I might lose out on getting more money from the other players by not putting in a value bet but I’m trying to learn how to win a big pots as well as the smaller ones.
Thanks for the comments!